Cancer care in Africa faces a unique challenge: the words used to describe cancer in many African languages evoke fear and stigma, often intensifying the psychological burden on patients. Language, when used thoughtfully, can be a powerful tool to encourage proactive healthcare engagement; however, when it evokes fear, it can become a barrier. Effective communication is vital in raising disease awareness and delivering compassionate care, but in African healthcare settings, linguistic sensitivity remains a significant gap.
A Growing Health Crisis
Africa’s cancer rates are rising faster than any other region globally, making effective communication about the disease urgent. Africa’s diversity, with roughly 2,000 languages spoken across the continent, means that culturally sensitive approaches are crucial. Research shows that the way cancer terminology is communicated can deeply impact how patients and communities understand, discuss, and approach cancer care. When cancer-related terms carry fearful or fatalistic connotations, they may deter individuals from seeking diagnosis or treatment. Transforming these language barriers could be a vital step toward reducing fear and promoting early intervention.
Why Words Matter
In healthcare, the language chosen to describe diseases significantly influences public perception, often shaping attitudes toward treatment. In a recent study I coauthored, we analyzed cancer-related terms in various African languages and cultural contexts, with a particular focus on terms like “cancer,” “malignant,” “chronic,” and “radiotherapy.” We surveyed 107 healthcare professionals, community health workers, and researchers from 32 African countries, covering 44 languages. Participants provided translations for 16 cancer-related terms and explained their cultural meanings. The findings revealed that many translations contained fearful connotations, referring to the disease in terms of spiritual malevolence or fatalism. This can result in health disparities, as patients may delay or avoid treatment due to fear or misunderstandings about their prognosis.
Fearful Imagery in Cancer Terminology
The study revealed that cancer terminology often has negative cultural meanings. For instance, “cancer” was associated with heaviness, overwhelming power, and terminality, often conveying the disease as unbeatable and final. Terms like “malignant” and “chronic” also carried implications of hopelessness or inevitability, shaping cancer as a condition with little to no remedy. Additionally, “radiotherapy” was frequently translated to imply burning or scorching, evoking fire or electricity. Such translations can make life-saving treatments appear frightening, deterring individuals from seeking potentially curative interventions.
Cultural Metaphors with Potential for Positive Change
In contrast to the fearful language associated with many cancer terms, African languages also offer rich, culturally resonant metaphors that can powerfully and compassionately convey medical concepts. For example, a Ugandan participant translated “metastasis” (the spread of cancer) into a Luganda metaphor: “ekiziba kyasindika obwana bwayo ahare,” meaning “the mother mass has sent seedlings into another site.” This imagery likens metastasis to the natural spread of seedlings, presenting a vivid and accessible understanding of cancer spread. Similarly, in Wolof, cancer is described as “the wound with which we will be buried,” in Djerma as “forest disease,” and in Shona as “parasitic plant.” Such expressions deepen understanding by linking cancer to cultural elements, which can make the concept less alien and potentially less intimidating.
Learning from Past Health Campaigns
The HIV/AIDS epidemic in Africa provides a powerful example of how shifting language can reduce stigma and improve healthcare access. During the early years of the epidemic, terminology surrounding HIV was heavily stigmatizing. However, campaigns aimed at using non-stigmatizing, supportive language helped reshape public perception, fostering greater empathy and encouraging individuals to seek testing and treatment. Similarly, the Stop TB Partnership’s Tuberculosis Language Guide offers lessons in using neutral or positive language to discuss disease. These examples show that with thoughtful changes in language, healthcare providers can shift public attitudes toward cancer from fear to understanding and proactivity.
Recommendations for Change
The research suggests that linguists, healthcare professionals, and cultural leaders should collaborate to develop language that conveys medical accuracy while minimizing fear and stigma. Positive alternatives, such as those already used in African oncology programmes like the American Cancer Society’s patient education initiatives and the International Atomic Energy Agency’s Rays of Hope radiotherapy programme, show promise. By working toward compassionate and culturally aligned communication, healthcare systems in Africa can bridge the language gap and promote better outcomes.
A Call for Culturally Sensitive Terminology
The language used in healthcare shapes public understanding and individual actions. For cancer care in Africa, moving away from fear-inducing terminology is essential. By developing culturally sensitive and neutral terms, healthcare providers can improve communication, reduce stigma, and encourage more patients to seek timely, life-saving treatments. Redefining cancer communication in Africa is a crucial step toward health equity and compassionate care across the continent.
The African Research (AR) Index is a comprehensive scholarly directory and database focused explicitly on journal publishers that publish and disseminate African research.
