Mental health care is an urgent global concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where healthcare systems are overburdened and under-resourced. Nigeria — Africa’s most populous nation with over 200 million citizens — faces a critical shortage of trained mental health professionals, possessing fewer than 300 registered psychiatrists nationwide (Gureje et al., 2020). This scarcity forces many individuals with mental health needs to seek care outside the orthodox medical system, predominantly from traditional healers.
The video Africa’s Traditional Healers Treating Mental Health by BBC World Service highlights a groundbreaking pilot project in Nigeria that seeks to integrate traditional healing practices with orthodox medical care. This collaboration aims to harness the strengths of both systems to improve mental health outcomes, reduce harmful practices, and expand access to treatment.
This report offers a comprehensive breakdown of the video’s content, including the rationale for the collaboration, the mechanisms of integration, early results, stakeholder perspectives, and implications for the future of mental healthcare in Nigeria and beyond.
Context and Rationale for Integration
The Mental Health Crisis in Nigeria
Nigeria faces a severe mental health crisis. According to WHO (2017), only 0.06 psychiatrists exist per 100,000 population in Nigeria, far below the global average. This gap means the majority of Nigerians have no direct access to psychiatric services. In rural and underserved regions, the gap is even greater, with traditional healers often serving as the first — and sometimes only — point of care for individuals with mental health conditions.
Traditional healers, or babas, typically attribute mental illness to spiritual causes and employ rituals, herbal remedies, and spiritual intervention as treatment. While these practices are culturally embedded and widely trusted, they sometimes involve harmful or ineffective approaches (Ogunsemi et al., 2010). The integration project seeks to address these limitations while respecting the cultural importance of traditional healing.
The Collaboration Model: Mechanisms and Goals
Mechanism of Partnership
The project pairs traditional healers with orthodox medical professionals — doctors and nurses — in a collaborative care model. The central idea is to train healers to identify symptoms of mental illness that require medical attention and refer such cases to orthodox practitioners, thereby creating a bridge between the two systems.
Chief Mukaila Yusuf, a notable traditional healer featured in the video, exemplifies this approach by assessing patients and determining whether they require orthodox medical treatment. This collaborative model aligns with WHO recommendations to integrate culturally acceptable mental healthcare into mainstream health systems (WHO, 2019).
Goals of Integration
The integration initiative aims to:
-
Improve Access: By utilising the network of traditional healers who are present in abundance, the project increases reach to underserved populations.
-
Harm Reduction: Reducing harmful or ineffective practices by equipping traditional healers with basic psychiatric knowledge.
-
Enhance Treatment Outcomes: Combining spiritual and medical treatments to offer holistic care.
-
Cultural Respect: Maintaining traditional practices while incorporating evidence-based medical care.
Outcomes and Evidences of Success
Reported Improvements
Early findings suggest that patients receiving combined care show greater improvements compared to those treated solely by traditional healers. The video highlights the case of Adaje, whose wife recovered significantly through the combined efforts of a healer and orthodox nurses, reflecting the potential of the partnership.
A referenced study within the project revealed measurable improvements in patient outcomes, including reduced symptom severity and faster recovery times, suggesting a synergy between traditional healing and biomedical approaches (Gureje et al., 2020).
Endorsement by International Bodies
The WHO advocates for such integrative approaches, arguing they can address mental health treatment gaps globally while respecting cultural contexts. The Nigerian pilot is presented as a scalable model for other countries with similar mental health resource shortages.
Stakeholders and Participants
The project draws together multiple stakeholders:
-
Traditional Healers (Babas): Primary community-based mental health providers, skilled in culturally grounded approaches to healing.
-
Chief Mukaila Yusuf: Featured as an active participant assessing patients and referring cases for orthodox treatment.
-
-
Orthodox Medical Staff:
-
Doctors and Nurses: Work alongside healers to provide biomedical care.
-
Registered Psychiatrists: Serve as a scarce but vital resource for training and oversight.
-
-
Patients: Beneficiaries of integrated mental health treatment.
-
Community Representatives: Advocates for culturally sensitive healthcare models.
-
World Health Organization (WHO): Supporting and promoting the expansion of such integrative models globally.
Critique of the Integration Model
Strengths
-
Accessibility: Utilises existing networks of traditional healers to broaden reach.
-
Cultural Alignment: Integrates care into local belief systems, increasing acceptability.
-
Potential for Harm Reduction: Training healers may reduce harmful practices and improve patient safety.
-
Positive Early Outcomes: Evidence suggests improvement in recovery rates and patient satisfaction.
Limitations
-
Standardisation Challenges: Variations in healer training, knowledge, and practice can complicate integration.
-
Potential Conflicts: Differing worldviews between traditional and biomedical practitioners may cause misunderstandings.
-
Quality Control: Ensuring consistent, safe, and evidence-based treatment remains challenging.
-
Scalability Concerns: Expansion requires sustained funding, training, and monitoring.
Implications and Future Directions
The Nigerian pilot presents a promising model for bridging the mental health treatment gap in low-resource settings. Key implications include:
-
Policy Integration: Governments could incorporate such collaborative models into national mental health strategies.
-
Training Frameworks: Development of standardised training for traditional healers to identify and refer cases requiring medical attention.
-
Research Expansion: Rigorous, longitudinal studies to evaluate the sustainability and scalability of the model.
-
International Adoption: WHO endorsement suggests global applicability for similar integrative mental healthcare frameworks.
Conclusion
Nigeria’s mental health crisis demands innovative solutions. The collaboration between traditional healers and orthodox medical practitioners represents a culturally grounded, pragmatic response to the shortage of mental health professionals. By leveraging the trust and accessibility of traditional healers, this integration model has the potential to expand access, improve outcomes, and reduce harmful practices — all while respecting Nigeria’s rich cultural heritage.
While challenges exist, the early evidence and WHO endorsement suggest this approach could be a vital template for other countries with similar mental health care gaps. The Nigerian case illustrates that traditional knowledge and modern medicine need not be mutually exclusive but can work in harmony to transform mental healthcare delivery.
