Ghanaian researcher documents the diversity of livestock poisonous plants and their antidotes

Published In: Ghana Journal of Science
Article Link: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/gjs/article/view/204490/192833
Author(s): Domozoro, C.Y.F., Wilcock, C.C., Swaine, M.D. and Price, A.H.

Ghanaian researcher documents the diversity of livestock poisonous plants and their antidotes
Photo Illustration: Ghanaian researcher documents the diversity of livestock poisonous plants and their antidotes
Photo Credit
: Mint Images

This study was conducted by a Ghanaian researcher Dr. Domozoro, C.Y.F. (CSIR – Animal Research Institute, P. O. Box AH20, Achimota, Accra, Ghana) and colleagues Wilcock, C.C., Swaine, M.D. and Price, A.H. (all of School of Biological Science, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Aberdeen, UK).

The authors explained that the survival of an extensive livestock system, which is the major practice of most farmers in the livestock industry in Ghana, depends heavily on natural pastures as forage resource. To efficiently use the rangelands, knowledge of the species composition, especially those of poisonous plants is essential. The authors posited that documented knowledge in this subject, at the time of reporting, is very scanty in Ghana. And believed that documentation and dissemination of this knowledge would enable a wider access and utilization of the rangelands and ensure more benefit to stakeholders and livestock farmers.

The researchers conducted interviews with the aid of structured questionnaires to solicit response from respondents in the three (3) zones in Ghana (northern zone, middle belt and southern zone) pooled together for the study with major stakeholders in the livestock industry.

The researchers noted that all participants selected for the study gave their oral informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. And that each respondent could provide more than one report, depending on  the  number of  different  accounts  of  plant  poisoning  of livestock  provided.  The questionnaire recorded at least one incident  of  plant poisoning  with  possible  strategy(ies)  for managing the situation, while items listed in any report as potentially poisonous to livestock, its antidote or others, required a citation. In addition, several materials  could  be  cited  in  a  report. At  the end of interviews, respondents could choose between two options to provide plant and/or other material  samples  cited  in  discussion: (1) either  by taking  the  researchers  to  the  field  to  fetch the  plant  or  (2) going  alone  to  obtain  samples, which  were  brought  back  to  the  researchers.

Voucher  specimens  of  plants  cited  were pressed with the aid of a field press to absorb excess moisture and preserve plants in good condition for later study. The pressed material was labelled with collection date, local name, location and recorded use (poison or antidote). Voucher specimens were later deposited at the University of Aberdeen Herbarium (ABD) and the Animal Research Institute, Ghana.

The researchers employed the methods outlined by Irvine in 1961 and  Dokosi  in 1998  in identifying the plants and  confirmed  their identities by comparing them with herbarium specimens in the  Ghana  Herbarium,  University  of  Ghana. Occasionally, specimens provided did not have enough features for a conclusive identification and some respondents provided local names; but  could  not  provide  species  names,  these remained  unidentified  and  were noted in  the  study results.  The researchers named (nomenclature) the plants samples following  the African  flowering  plants  database  (2008), the  International  Plant  Names  Index  (2008) and  the  Germplasm  Resources  Information Network (GRIN, 2007).

The researchers reiterated that the study was conducted in Ghana on poisonous plants with the aim to discover the existence and diversity of poisonous plants and associated antidotes affecting livestock for the purpose of documentation and preservation of knowledge. During the course of the study, 70 different items were cited by respondents; 22 were poisonous plants for which antidotes were not cited, 28 were poisonous plants with known antidotes and 32 antidotes. There were 575 citations of plants from 194 reported cases of suspected plant poisoning, categorized as poisonous plants for which no antidotes were cited (146), poisonous plants with cited antidotes (147) and antidotes (282). 50 plants species were identified and belonged to 29 plant families. Some plants were known only by local names.

The researchers concluded this extensive research aimed at soliciting and documenting extensive knowledge of the diversity of poisonous plants and antidotes with significance to livestock farming by successfully reporting a variety of previously undocumented materials. Sampled materials have been deposited at the University of Aberdeen Herbarium (ABD) and the Animal Research Institute, Ghana for reference purpose.

Thank you for reading

Do you have an interesting scholarly paper worth featuring on African Researchers Magazine? Well, we’d love to hear about it. Simply use the ARM Sample Letter to tell us about it.
https://www.africanresearchers.org/downloads/FeaturedArticleRequest.doc

Or would you love to contribute to African Researchers Magazine? We’ll be more than happy to work with you. Simply use the link below to register as an ARM Contributor
https://www.africanresearchers.org/arm-contributors-registration

Thank you for reading